Magine an encounter between Socrates and yourself Essay

Magine an encounter between Socrates and yourself - Essay Example This is especially with the strong warning that he issues towards jurors who are prone and subjected to judging people and the corruption it has on their lives and souls. Their wrongdoings; that Socrates observes, are that they are prone to unjustly sentencing people since they are in a position to do so both wrongfully and knowingly. Considering that Socrates judges’ ethics based on the grounds of practicality or pragmatism, my life falls more on the practical, where I would stand my ground against any judgments he would pass on me based on his basis of ethics. My replies on the question of ethical standing would fall under doing all rights under social pragmatics, where knowing right and wrong is not the problem, but rather practicing the right is significant to my actions. In relation to values, my standing would be that of believing in a whole body, mind and soul, where having a state of total equilibrium within the three forms would be a state of perfection in itself. As such, following the ways of the world or other people in the world without conviction would not arise. This is because I believe in authority, where those influencing my actions, behavior and state of mind should be qualified and ethically promising. Socrates argument in his works would never be applied to judge my state of values and ethics, especially on grounds of having a corrupt and broken body and soul while living my life claiming it to be worth (Brickhouse and Smith 339). Socrates raising the issue of social justice and injustices would find me ready on my defenses with a strong argument, not critiquing his works, but rather in their support. This is because both Socrates and I are of the opinion and belief that life is not worth living with rampant injustices and mutilations against the law, where the components are to be respected than mutilations of justice. In this case, I stand by his beliefs in that life is worth living provided it is lived to its fullness with justice and components of life facing fulfillment and receiving respect. This is to ensure that not a single life is lost or degraded thanks to injustices passed on by others and judgments delivered by us towards others. In addition, Socrates brings up the issue of life after death, where he was a strong believer in the concept of life after death. Replies to this issue would fall under two categories of religiosity and philosophy, where philosophy would put Socrates works into action and religion would reply with eternal life. My belief in eternal life is that religion, or rather most religions, where religion falls, supports eternal life. On the other hand, Socrates belief in eternal life falls under philosophy, in which one’s wrongdoings must never go unpunished both in life and death. As a result, all sins are to be punished in the afterlife should they not be paid for; in the current lifetime. My beliefs support the concept of an afterlife, which is in line with his ideologies and my religious views, as well. In such a case, for striving to ensure that wrongdoings are not committed by me in this lifetime, and those that are committed are atoned for, Socrates would be likely to not find me at fault. Instead, I believe congratulations would be in order towards me from Socrates for working hard towards creating a model life for myself and others around me. In